A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment

更新时间：2023-11-28

- A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment
- Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Vol. 22, Issue 4, Pages: 6-12(2000)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：
  CLC：
- Published：2000
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2000, 22(4): 6-12.
DOI：

A Comparison of Four Methods of Water Quality Assessment[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2000, 22(4): 6-12. DOI：

摘要

将人工神经网络技术运用于水质评价，建立了地面水环境质量综合评价的ＢＰ网络模型和Ｈｏｐｆｉｅｌｄ网络模型，并与水质综合评价方法中经典的模糊综合指数法和灰色聚类法进行了比较，结果表明，ＢＰ网络是四种方法中的首选。

Abstract

In this paper

a back propagation network

a Hopfield network

Fuzzy comprehensive index method and classification of gray are compared in application for water quality assessment. The comparison result shows that the BP network is the best one of these four methods.

关键词

Keywords

references

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

AI问答

Address：Journals Department, Chongqing University, 174 Shazhengjie, Chongqing 400044, P.R.China Postal code：400044
Tel：+86-23-65111322 Email：xuebao@cqu.edu.cn
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder electronics co., LTD 京ICP备09064830号-19 京公网安备11010802024621
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰