Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China
|更新时间:2023-11-28
|
Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China
Journal of Civil and Environmental EngineeringVol. 30, Issue 5, Pages: 4-9(2008)
ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 4-9.
DOI:
ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 4-9. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2008.05.002.
Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China
Research on carrying capacity as an important indicator describing the state of regional urbanrural systems is quite important. Based on an analysis of urbanrural system elements characteristics and mechanism
mathematical models were established to evaluate regional comprehensive carrying capacity and development expenditure level. These models were applied to a case study of Hainan Province
P. R. China
using statistical data from 1995 to 2005. The conclusions are as follows: (1) During this period
the carrying capacity of the regional urbanrural system in Hainan fluctuated
and the capacity was overloaded from 1995 to 1998
under loaded from 1999 to 2001
and overloaded again from 2002 to 2005. (2) The degree of coordination between the regional natural and socioeconomic carrying systems is 0.60
three times the regional multiple carrying capacity. Both the socioeconomic and natural carrying capacities rose unsteadily
averaging 0.30 and 0.11
respectively. (3) The contribution of various carrying factors to regional multiple carrying capacity is quite different. Carrying capacity factors include socioeconomic development
human resources
imports
environmental and resource possession. Their average rates of contribution were 31.40%
22.71%
18.79%
13.64% and 13.45%
respectively. (4) From 1995 to 2004
economic development expenditures were the principal part of all regional expenditures
the contributing 61.88%. In 2005
export expenditures exceeded economic development expenditures
becoming an important part of the all regional expenditures.