LI Yong-hua, GUI Guo-qing. Error Analysis between Relative Motion Solving Method and Absolute Displacement Direct Solving Method[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2011, 33(5): 83-89.
DOI:
LI Yong-hua, GUI Guo-qing. Error Analysis between Relative Motion Solving Method and Absolute Displacement Direct Solving Method[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2011, 33(5): 83-89. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2011.05.014.
Error Analysis between Relative Motion Solving Method and Absolute Displacement Direct Solving Method
the damping is proportional to the relative velocity in relative motion method
While the damping is proportional to the absolute velocity in method of direct solving absolute displacement
and the damping assuming difference may cause the calculation errors on structural responses. The structural response errors of the dynamic component of power spectral density between the two solving methods are derived by random vibration theoretical analysis in Rayleigh damping model
which include damping ratio and the ratio between excitation frequency and fundamental frequency of the structures. Based on probability theory
the variation errors of dynamic component response between the two solving methods are also derived by theoretical analysis
and some numerical examples are provided to verify the error analysis. At last
it is pointed out that the calculation errors between the two solving methods decrease with damping ratio
and it is negligible when the damping ratio of structure is less than 5%.