福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析

范亚明 李兴友 付祥钊

doi:10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2007.01.023

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析

更新时间：2023-11-28

- 福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析
- Annual Energy Consumption and Feasibility Assessment of Ground -Source Heat Pump in Residential Building in Fuzhou City
- 土木与环境工程学报（中英文） 2007年29卷第1期页码：93-95100
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
  
  福建工程学院科研发展基金资助项目（GY-Z0304）
- DOI：10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2007.01.023
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2007
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
范亚明李兴友付祥钊. 福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报（中英文）, 2007,29(1):93-95100.

Annual Energy Consumption and Feasibility Assessment of Ground -Source Heat Pump in Residential Building in Fuzhou City[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 93-95100.
范亚明李兴友付祥钊. 福州住宅应用土壤源热泵的全年能耗与可行性分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报（中英文）, 2007,29(1):93-95100. DOI： 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2007.01.023.

Annual Energy Consumption and Feasibility Assessment of Ground -Source Heat Pump in Residential Building in Fuzhou City[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2007, 29(1): 93-95100. DOI： 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2007.01.023.

摘要

以福州地区典型的单户住宅为实例

在全年逐时建筑负荷计算的基础上

进行空气源热泵和地源热泵的全年能耗分析

并在此基础上进行两者的经济性比较。结果表明

从全年能耗比较

土壤源热泵比空气源热泵节能15%

其中夏季节能13%;冬季节能20%。尽管土壤源热泵机组的季节性能比SE-ER高于空气源热泵

但由于福州冬季室外气温较温和

夏季地温偏高

土壤源热泵的节能效果不及夏热冬冷地区明显

并且初投资回收期较长

经济可行性较差。

Abstract

This paper describes the annual energy consumption and economic assessment of air-source heat pump(ASHP) and ground-source heat pump(GSHP)

based on hourly building load of typical house in Fuzhou.Analysis results show that the energy consumption of GSHP is 15% less than that of ASHP through all year

where there is 13% less in summer and 20% less in winter.Although the seasonal energy efficiency ratio of GSHP in Fuzhou is higher than that of ASHP

it has no obvious effect on the energy efficiency as it is in the hot summer and cold winter zone.In comparison with ASHP

the GSHP is not cost-effective.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

下载量

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

提交

工具集

关联资源

暂无数据