1. 中国土地矿产法律事务中心,北京100034
2. 中国科学院 地理科学与资源研究所,北京,100101
纸质出版:2008
移动端阅览
张富刚, 刘彦随. 沿海快速发展地区城乡系统承载力的定量评估——以海南省为例[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2008,30(5):4-9.
ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 4-9.
张富刚, 刘彦随. 沿海快速发展地区城乡系统承载力的定量评估——以海南省为例[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2008,30(5):4-9. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2008.05.002.
ZHANG Fugang, LIU Yansui. Quantitative Appraisement of the Carrying Capacity of an Urban-rural System in a Rapidly Developing Coastal Region: A Case Study of Hainan Province, P. R. China[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2008, 30(5): 4-9. DOI: 10.11835/j.issn.1674-4764.2008.05.002.
通过建立区域城乡系统承载-消耗定量评价模型,对1995—2005年海南省城乡系统承载力状态进行了评估与实证分析。结果表明:(1)海南省区域城乡系统状态呈现波动变化,经历了一个超载—可载—超载的过程;(2)社会经济承载力与资源环境承载力均呈波动上升趋势,二者的协调度为0.60,是复合承载力的3倍;(3)各要素承载对复合承载力的贡献率大小顺序依次为:社会经济水平、人力资源基础、外部支撑能力、生态环境状况和资源禀赋条件,平均贡献率分别为31.40%、22.71、18.79%、13.64%和13.45;(4)1995—2004年经济发展消耗水平是区域发展消耗水平的主导驱动因素,贡献率为61.88%,2005年区域对外输出能力超过经济发展消耗水平,贡献率分别为46.89%和44.75%。
Research on carrying capacity as an important indicator describing the state of regional urbanrural systems is quite important. Based on an analysis of urbanrural system elements characteristics and mechanism
mathematical models were established to evaluate regional comprehensive carrying capacity and development expenditure level. These models were applied to a case study of Hainan Province
P. R. China
using statistical data from 1995 to 2005. The conclusions are as follows: (1) During this period
the carrying capacity of the regional urbanrural system in Hainan fluctuated
and the capacity was overloaded from 1995 to 1998
under loaded from 1999 to 2001
and overloaded again from 2002 to 2005. (2) The degree of coordination between the regional natural and socioeconomic carrying systems is 0.60
three times the regional multiple carrying capacity. Both the socioeconomic and natural carrying capacities rose unsteadily
averaging 0.30 and 0.11
respectively. (3) The contribution of various carrying factors to regional multiple carrying capacity is quite different. Carrying capacity factors include socioeconomic development
human resources
imports
environmental and resource possession. Their average rates of contribution were 31.40%
22.71%
18.79%
13.64% and 13.45%
respectively. (4) From 1995 to 2004
economic development expenditures were the principal part of all regional expenditures
the contributing 61.88%. In 2005
export expenditures exceeded economic development expenditures
becoming an important part of the all regional expenditures.
0
浏览量
626
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621