1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院
2. 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点实验室,重庆,400030
3. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆,400030
纸质出版:2012
移动端阅览
李正英, 党朋朋, 李竟涛. 静力非线性方法用于桥梁高墩抗震性能分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2012,34(5):42-49.
LI Zhengying, DANG Pengpeng, LI Jingtao. Application of Pushover Method to Seismic Performance Evaluation of Tall Piers for Bridge[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012, 34(5): 42-49.
李正英, 党朋朋, 李竟涛. 静力非线性方法用于桥梁高墩抗震性能分析[J]. 土木与环境工程学报(中英文), 2012,34(5):42-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2012.05.007.
LI Zhengying, DANG Pengpeng, LI Jingtao. Application of Pushover Method to Seismic Performance Evaluation of Tall Piers for Bridge[J]. Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2012, 34(5): 42-49. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4764.2012.05.007.
高墩桥梁由于结构本身的特点,墩高使得高阶振型的影响更明显,笔者基于“等效振型高度”的概念对通常采用的MPA(Modal Pushover Analysis)方法提出改进,并采用几种不同侧向力分布模式的Pushover以及动力时程分析对桥梁单墩进行对比分析,以研究改进的MPA法应用于桥梁高墩抗震性能分析的计算精度和有效性。分析结果表明,当地震动强度较小时,MPA法和改进MPA法可以较好的改善计算结果;随着地震动强度的增大,改进MPA法的计算精度优于MPA法。
For bridge with tall piers
the influence of higher modes on structural responses becomes more evident. Modified MPA method(MMPA) which is based on MPA theory and the concept of “equivalent mode height” is presented. To verify the effectiveness and the degree of accuracy of this method
several Pushover methods including MPA and MMPA methods were adopted to analyze tall piers for bridge
and then compares the results with that in dynamic time-history analysis. It is shown that MPA and MMPA methods can improve computational accuracy comparing with other normal Pushover methods when seismic intensity is lower
whereas the computational accuracy for MMPA methods is superior to that in MPA analysis with the seismic intensity becoming larger.
0
浏览量
935
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621